an act or instance of appropriating. and appropriating is to take exclusive possession of. It is about how he makes it his and how it is personal to him. Also how he made it to be a unique piece of art. Also how he uses a type of art that is out there and expands on it to make it cooler and a makes a new section that will be remembered cause it is amazing.
2) Review Daniels Gordon's work, evaluate its success.
It was all made with random stuff that you think might be garbage and he made it work. so it is a huge success by how he made it all. Also he did this all to try to say a message to us about what makes art art. I also think that his art is gonna be a big hit if people start to see how art can be anything if you put your mind to it and work hard on it to make it an art piece.
3) By what standards did you deem it successful? Yours or his?
I think it is successful just by how it was made. But it could have been made to what he thinks was successful and it was made to be something cool and made cool art out of nothing but random pictures. And if he made to what he thinks was a success I think it is a huge success even if no one else thinks it is good I think it is amazing.
4) How does he expand the meaning of photography in his work?
Well he is using pictures and making something out of it then taking a picture of it. Also he is trying to use thing that no one ever tried to use before, and he is going to make us all realize that it doesn't take much to make art. He took it to a newer state and it is a cool way to express yourself to others by this.
5) How much time is spent "in process"? Is this important? Why or Why not?
There is about 90% time spent in process. This is important to the art work that he is doing because, with out it he may not get to the building of the art piece. Also what he is doing is really time consuming by doing the art style that he is doing. Also
No comments:
Post a Comment